I am glad to read the responses below. I don't think the 'media' yet understand what a perilous position in which the have put themselves. Regardless of the proclaimed or intuited political affiliation of the channel, no one trusts the media not to twist, edit or otherwise distort what anyone, let alone a presidential candidate, has to say. The wiser course is to just stay clear of the 'media' and let people absorb what they can without their chosen filter bubble interpreting for them. Journalism will have to do a much better job of policing itself to regain trust. And BTW, do away with Section 230, as a start.
I am glad to read the responses below. I don't think the 'media' yet understand what a perilous position in which the have put themselves. Regardless of the proclaimed or intuited political affiliation of the channel, no one trusts the media not to twist, edit or otherwise distort what anyone, let alone a presidential candidate, has to say. The wiser course is to just stay clear of the 'media' and let people absorb what they can without their chosen filter bubble interpreting for them. Journalism will have to do a much better job of policing itself to regain trust. And BTW, do away with Section 230, as a start.