12 Comments
User's avatar
Scott F's avatar

Or, instead of shooting for a supermajority, we could run and elect candidates that are willing to work across the aisle

Expand full comment
Kathleen Weber's avatar

TYPO: "the last party to d"

Incomplete sentence

Expand full comment
Mary Puppé's avatar

Is it purposeful? A nice stalemate keeps both sides in business. 🤔

Expand full comment
thomas bartholomew's avatar

It’s not luck. It’s the environment

Expand full comment
Stan Michael's avatar

I think the doom loop continues until we fix the primary process, which skews the choice of candidates. Only the most ardent voters turn out for primaries, often representing polarizing viewpoints.

Expand full comment
Melissa's avatar

Thanks for this analysis, Gabe. Left me feeling more hopeful than I have in a long time!

Expand full comment
Bill Nelson's avatar

Sorry, Gabe, I didn't really care for this one. It seems more rumormongering that news and analysis, two things you are quite adept at.

Expand full comment
Jordan Meadows's avatar

No mention of North Carolina and Tillis/Cooper? Democrats have a great chance at taking it.

And Texas is looking more and more like a soon-to-be swing state; thanks for the affirmation!

This was very informative!

Expand full comment
David Hopper's avatar

Interesting analysis. Thank you Gabe.

Expand full comment
Miriam Rodin's avatar

I get it. Lucid. They don't really believe anything they say to voters. It's just a job.

Expand full comment
AJ Ong's avatar

Just so good, Gabe. Excellent analysis. You're setting records with your political journalism WAR

Expand full comment