5 Comments
User's avatar
Judy Parrish's avatar

I don't like listening to podcasts (I can read much faster than most people can talk, and if you could talk that fast, I probably wouldn't be able to understand you), but your written outline has its usual commonsense tone. I seriously think that the NYT and others would absolutely LOVE it if Trump could somehow overturn the elections rather than just bloviate. That would allow them to *really* vent their hatred of him. I don't like the bloviation, either, but it is just air signifying (usually) nothing. Why people allow themselves to get into such a froth about all this gas is beyond me and makes me wonder why so few people have actual lives to live that they can spend so much time on it.

Scott F's avatar

I am of the same opinion regarding podcasts/videos. Maybe Gabe could provide a transcript to subscribers?

Tova Adesnik's avatar

Thank you, Gabe, for a clear, concise and well-reasoned explanation of potential scenarios. Thank you also for helping us off the emotional ledge we’re pushed to walk by other media commentators.

Aaron’s Party (Come Get It)'s avatar

It’s wild this is even a hypothetical scenario

Michael Bower's avatar

When I read your title I thought, "oh no, Gabe is going a bit "conflict entrepreneur" on us."

But, then reading your post I realized the actual conflict entrepreneurs have been hard at this scary headline for a while.

I really only get my political news from you, so I wasn't aware of the NYT, etc.